Wikipedia

搜索结果

2015年6月11日星期四

Macro Converter Lens VS Extension Tube

拍微距那么久了一直有一个问题想知道。上网找,请教了朋友但还是弄不清楚。
那就是拍微距时用Converter lens 和用Extension Tube到底有什么分别呢?放大率呀!景深呀!到底哪个更理想呢?
为了得到这个问题的答案,只有一个办法。那就是同时拥有两样并做对比了。所以,现在我同时拥有Raynox DCR250 Converter Lens及10mm,16mmExtension Tube. 在好奇心驱使下做了比较。
大家可以看看下面的几张照片比较比较并给意见。
结论(个人认为):
Extension Tube 10+16mm放大倍率小于Raynox DCR-250 Converter Lens.(当然加多一个Ext Tube就能得到更大的放大倍率)。
画质和景深差别几乎没什么不同。所以两种都是拍微距的利器。这就是我想知道已久的答案。
如硬要分出差别的话,Raynox DCR-250会有轻微的色散问题。毕竟比Extension tube多了片镜片。

希望面对这个疑问的朋友看了后多少有些许帮助。
* 照片都没剪裁。

There is a question I can't find the answer when I start my macro photography.

What is the different between Macro Converter lens and Extension tube? Is the DOF or IQ different?

The solution to make clear of this is own both of them and do the comparison.

You can see the photos below and find the answer. Welcome for any input.

Conclusion(Personal conclusion):
The magnification of the Raynox DCR-250 Converter lens is larger than using Extension Tube 10mm+16mm.(For sure that you can get larger magnification if you add one more Ext Tube) 

For me, Image quality and the Depth of field are almost the same. Hard to see the different. And this is the answer that I want to know since I start to shot macro.

If really want to list out the different between them, there is light chromatic dispersion on macro converter lens(have glass) compare with extension tube(no glass).


Hope this comparison can let you found out the answer you want to know.

*Photos all no crop.








Translate